I finished Stephen Eliot’s The Adderall Diaries tonight. I’ll probably say this again, but it’s amazing. And fucked up. I was reading the last couple chapters intermittently, sneaking a few pages in while my coffee partner was in the bathroom or manning the counter for the shop’s owner.
The book is like a drug, like Adderall itself, maybe. First I wanted to read it in 5 milligram doses, and later I wanted to crush it on a TP dispenser in a bathroom and snort it. That’s how I felt driving home with around ten pages left to read. Crush and snort.
My friend and I had this incredible, rambling conversation for almost four hours. We talked about my manuscript first, my “process”. She writes, or did and will again. We took a creative writing class once, long ago in (for me anyway) another lifetime. I think about my “process” in quotations marks because the term suggests an established methodology. I feel the same way thinking of it as my “process” as I do about calling the manuscript my “work in progress”. Both seem dishonest because, well, it’s my first time. I’m making this shit up as I go along.
If I do stuff the same way next time then maybe I can say it’s part of a process. When I start the second book it’ll be a WIP. Maybe. This time though, it’s just “the work”. I’m involved in “a process” in the sense that I’m working through something, but there’s nothing established yet that I can say is “my process”. It technically is a work in progress, I admit, but talking about it as my WIP seems presumptuous. I’m the only one that actually knows there is or will be any other WIP. You can only take my word for it.
And we talked about artists, meeting them, how there’s a difference between meeting an artist to take their autograph away as a souvenir and actually meeting them, asking them about what they like in life, what matters to them. Having coffee with them (or just wanting to) instead of just wanting to get proof that you met them. She talked about the difference between meeting the band so that you can take a bit more from them after the show, and meeting the band so that you can give something back. Neither is wrong or right, but there's a difference.
There was other stuff too: self-discipline and how it isn’t discipline when we love to do it. How it can look like discipline to other people, maybe, but to the person loving it, it’s just good fun. And music. And the difference between literary fiction and genre fiction. And definitions of success. And how hard it is, when we assume a definition contrary to cultural norms, to express how we’re successful. And on and on and on. It was delicious.
I don’t know quite what to think of The Adderall Diaries beyond my belief that it’s amazing. I don’t want to try to figure Mr. Elliott out from it, or even have it inform my opinion of him as a person. I don’t think I want to have an opinion of him as a person, at least not from his writing. It’s a memoir, and a wonderful read. It’s ugly and beautiful and painful and tense. But it’s not him, you know? Even he says that he writes to figure shit out. Memoir is fun because it’s opinion, not autobiography. Factual accuracy isn’t the point, even if it is accurate. The point is not to take it as fact. The point is to enjoy the experience.
We all want to be known, maybe artists more than anyone. We metaphorically (or literally) bleed into whatever medium is relevant. There’s a cost we decide is worth paying at some point, and then we pay it. We say it’s just for us or for the art, but we want to be known, to share something. To express. But we only share a very little bit.
I love Pearl Jam, love Vedder’s lyrics, the passion and angst. I’d love to have coffee with him and pick his brain, to know him and be known by him. Truth is though, that even in the bizarro world that allowed me to have coffee with Eddie Vedder, we simply might not hit it off. At all. The hypothetical conversation might suck. I might not like him. He might not like me. Doesn’t matter though. I’d still like the music and the words and the voice. He is not his music. His music is not him.
When I got home there was a broken mouse dragging a trap across the kitchen floor. The roommates are away, camping. I showed it as much compassion as I could, imagining its fear, and the pain. It was trapped at the hip, broken on the same side I was. I had to euthanize the mouse, right? Right? I know of no non-violent way to do that with a mouse broken in a trap. So the climax of my evening sucked. Finishing Adderall ended up being massively anti-climactic.
Writing about it all works better as a denouement. It’s like using mouth wash.
Memoirs should not be read as biography. We are ridiculously incredible, fragile, strong, broken, ascendant bags of meat. I don’t know Stephen Elliott, not even now. Not at all.
p.s. Revisions on the WIP are going really well. I'm loving my process. ... ... ... uh, yeah.
sheri · 709 weeks ago
As always, a great descriptive read:}
tolthinkfree 66p · 709 weeks ago
And thanks. ;)
giulietta nardone · 709 weeks ago
I agree that folks want to be known, to be seen for who they are. Yet, that's the hardest thing to accomplish. If you're an artist in the public eye, people want to turn you into something they want to worship.
Being a fan puts fans in a weird place as well. The move to create more fans makes us less likely to be real people as well.
Do we naturally want to rush these folks? I what goes on with fan worship of folks we don't even know.
I like where you're going with this conversation. Who do we know?
G.
My recent post The Disobedient Bra Strap
tolthinkfree 66p · 709 weeks ago
I think that there's a push/pull with the wanting to be known through art thing. I think that artists love the idea of being known through their art, and hate the realization that their art will never reveal themselves. Fans only see the reflection they want to see. it still takes a real relationship, with all of it's intimacy and danger, to even approach the idea of the possibility of being known. Fans can't ever do that. The second they get close enough to begin to know an artist, they have to stop being fans and start being friends.
And yes, I do think that the drive to accrue fame can be utterly self-destructive unless there's a profound commitment to understand the falsity inherent in celebrity. My favorite famous people are the ones that abjure the fame as much as possible, which is a fun dichotomy to think about.
Fame and celebrity, the way our culture sets people up to watch them fall, is so fascinating. I think we all look for heroes, people to look up to, to set the example. The ones the media helps us pick are, of course, usually completely wrong for the job. Not to mention that we transfer our love of an artist's art into love of them, with no logical basis for the jump. Inevitably the artist turns out to be human, at least as fucked up as the general public if not more so, and then we love watching them go down in flames. It's attractive because seeing people fall reminds us that at least we aren't that low; at least we haven't been arrested for crashing our sports car while high; at least we haven't stooped like that; there's no way we'd fuck up as bad given the same advantages. For a moment we can seem to shine by comparison. And then we also love the phoenix story too, when they learn and grow and find a way to crawl out of the ashes. That gives up hope too.
Fame is nasty.
Paul Joseph · 709 weeks ago
My recent post Obstacles: A Guest Post By M.R. Merrick
tolthinkfree 66p · 709 weeks ago
And who doesn't have one of those piles of "to be read" books? What kind of life would it be without one?
-j- · 709 weeks ago
Okay, let me have it, m. Tell me how I've got that wrong! <3
My recent post How do you want to feel?
tolthinkfree 66p · 709 weeks ago
I have no objection to work in progress. At all. It's a great phrase and WIP is such a cool acronym. You have gotten nothing wrong at all.
I'll love to use it unabashedly when I have another WIP on the go (which I kind of already do, but not really yet). It just seems like one of those phrases that "real writers" use, and I guess part of me is still holding my breath until I actually finish the first "work", subsequently suggesting that I CAN actually finish a work and that I have this queue of works to be working on. :)
In other words, it's totally my neurosis. I have legitimacy issues. :)
Lura Slowinski · 709 weeks ago
But, unfortunately, there are times when it's easier not to know anything about the author/creator. For the most part I like to think I've been able to love a work even when I learn something unsavory about the author, but there are limits. Like the composer Wagner, who was a massive anti-semite elevated by the Nazis to national hero status. Ride of the Valkyries loses some of its gusto when you imagine it leading the Nazis onward to death and destruction. I've tried to take the "He is not his music. His music is not him" stance, but in some extreme cases it's difficult, and that's unfortunate because it is good music.
Also, you are too a real writer, and you do too have a WIP!
My recent post Playing the Sadist (Or, Writing Fiction)
tolthinkfree 66p · 709 weeks ago
I remember the same class in uni. My next paper was on Emily Dickinson and, by all the Gods of antiquity, how the hell does one divorce Emily from her poetry? I saw that it was possible to do it, to sanitize it of all biographical implication, but why would you want to? So I struck a compromise: I wrote everything that I wanted to say about the poem and what I felt it had to say about the human condition and then, at the end, wove Emily back in, hypothesizing how those very themes that I had picked out may have been particularly profound to her. And It worked. It was a better essay for it, and my prof completely forgave me.
The Wagner example is a great one. I know that I'm not capable of divorcing art from artist when the facts come to light. But I wish, sometimes, that I could. And I try very hard to not get caught up in worship based on great art. People are, after all is said and done, just people. The thought of being famous in our society scares the hell out of me. I wouldn't wish it on anyone, no matter how well they handle it.
To be clear, I really do think that one can learn a lot about an artist from their work. It's easy to be misled if one is trying to read too much into it, especially if one picks the wrong work, but it's very possible. But I have those strong feelings about the way our society worships fame and promotes celebrity as much to watch people fall as to lift them up. That's at least part of why I don't want to assume to much about Mr. Elliott from his memoir. I'd rather know him for who he really is (rather than for who he says he is obliquely and with astounding artistry) or not at all.
Thanks for being here and for your great comment, Lura!
Lura Slowinski · 709 weeks ago
My recent post Fearless Brainstorming
tolthinkfree 66p · 709 weeks ago
Neil Elliott · 673 weeks ago
tolthinkfree 66p · 673 weeks ago
Which is to say, no, I have no questions. Not for you anyway. It's a bit creepy that you'd show up to ask though, to be clear. Thanks for reading though.